Pages

Monday, July 9, 2012

The Amazing Spider-Man Review: Once More, With Passion



**Warning: Minor spoilers ahead**
 

Let’s just get this out of the way first: I don’t particularly like Sam Raimi’s Spider-Man trilogy. I found the first one mildly enjoyable, the second one alright but not nearly the masterpiece that some people make it out to be and the third one a farcical mess whose lone saving grace is James Franco’s performance as Harry Osbourne. So, when I heard that Sony was planning a complete makeover of everyone’s friendly neighborhood superhero even though the original franchise had jumpstarted a mere ten years ago, I honestly could not make much of a fuss. Sorry, if you want someone with whom to share your outrage over the idea of a tentpole blockbuster that exists for the sole purpose of maintaining the rights to a character, you’ll have to look elsewhere. Don’t get me wrong – this is a shameless, contemptible cash-grab, and I suppose that, as a staunch advocate for artistic integrity and whatnot, I’m obligated to root for The Amazing Spider-Man to fail on principle alone. But as a fan of Andrew Garfield, Emma Stone and (500) Days of Summer, it was impossible to contain my excitement for Marc Webb’s take on the now-ubiquitous superhero genre; if nothing else, it was sure to be interesting, perhaps unlike any comic book movie we’ve seen before.


Admittedly, it’s been a while since I last watched any of the Raimi Spider-Man movies, so my memory of them is probably rusty (who knows? Maybe if I watched it again, I’d realize that Spider-Man 2 is, in fact, as great a superhero movie as The Dark Knight). But suffice to say that the two versions are as different as any films with essentially the same plot can be. Whereas the original movies had a jokey, almost tongue-in-cheek vibe, Webb’s reboot injects a sprinkling of existential angst into the proceedings, making The Amazing Spider-Man perhaps the first superhero movie to combine the adventurous spirit of a standard Marvel blockbuster with the intimate emotionality of a coming-of-age drama. The news that Webb would be taking over the Spider-Man franchise despite having only one feature film to his name (the quirky, love-it-or-hate-it indie romance (500) Days of Summer) was greeted with predictable skepticism from fans, yet for the most part, the director navigates the minefield of ever-shifting tones with the deft ease of a veteran, seamlessly transitioning from comedy to drama to action spectacle. 

In fact, Webb’s relative lack of experience, his outsider-ness, may be precisely what makes The Amazing Spider-Man work. Let’s face it: the story itself is not all that groundbreaking, memorable or even particularly exciting. Although Rhys Ifans’s villain, Dr. Curt Connors, has a sympathetic side that elevates him slightly above the average superhero antagonist (it’s easy to imagine him in an episode of Fringe), the plot feels very been-there-done-that, from the by-the-numbers origin story to Martin Sheen’s monologue about responsibility that sounds like a feeble attempt to recreate a certain iconic quote from the original Spider-Man.  In short, this probably would have been a forgettable entry in the superhero genre along the lines of The Incredible Hulk or Ghost Rider if not for the playful exuberance that Webb brings to the director’s chair. Each scene, whether it’s an awkward conversation between Peter and Gwen or a chaotic, CGI-heavy showdown between Spider-Man and the Lizard, practically glows with energy, the kind of starry-eyed enthusiasm that you would never see in a film-maker who has been in the business long enough to grow jaded. It’s ironic that this movie has been regarded with such bitterness and doubt because, whatever Sony’s reason for rebooting the franchise so soon, Webb clearly poured his heart into it. The Amazing Spider-Man is the opposite of cynical; it’s the lively, unabashedly optimistic manifestation of a fanboy’s dream come true.

Just look at the action sequences. On the surface, they aren’t particularly remarkable or unique, not like the zero-gravity fight scene from Inception or the heart-stopping Burj Khalifa set piece from Mission: Impossible – Ghost Protocol (to name a couple recent examples), and I’d be hard-pressed to remember specific details from any of them. Yet I’d also be hard-pressed to think of many action scenes, especially from superhero movies, that are as flat-out exhilarating as the ones in The Amazing Spider-Man. It’s like a rush of adrenaline: the sensation wears off quickly afterward, but when you’re in the moment, watching it unfold before you on a 20-foot screen, it’s simply overwhelming. Webb uses fluid, fast-paced camerawork to create a feeling of constant movement, watching as Spider-Man swoops from building to building and kicks criminal ass with the feverish glee of a kid playing with his new video game and showing an admirable lack of restraint in his use of 3D (The Amazing Spider-Man joins a short list of films like Avatar and Hugo in which the extra dimension not only enhances the experience but is practically required for viewing). Although many people will probably write off the over-the-top cinematography as distracting and gimmicky, it lends a visceral thrill to the otherwise generic – not to mention lengthy – action sequences; at times, it feels as though you’re right there with Spider-Man, soaring across the New York City skyline. 

If the visuals give the movie its sense of mythological grandeur, then the actors are what keep it anchored in reality, or at least something close to reality. The supporting cast is solid all around, with the aforementioned Rhys Ifans turning in a surprisingly low-key performance as Dr. Connors (though he is rendered semi-irrelevant once Connors becomes the computer-generated Lizard) and Martin Sheen and Sally Field providing the film’s pitch-perfect emotional core as Uncle Ben and Aunt May, respectively. On paper, Gwen Stacey feels a tad underdeveloped, and we don’t find out a whole lot about her besides the fact that she’s brainy, sensible and kind of flawless, but Emma Stone gives her an unaffected, down-to-earth poise that feels refreshing in comparison to the delicate, hysterical damsels-in-distress that usually populate blockbusters (perhaps, with Gwen and The Avengers’s Black Widow, the portrayal of women in comic book movies is taking a turn for the better?). She also shares natural chemistry with Andrew Garfield, and their sweet, largely chaste romance might be the best I’ve ever seen in a superhero movie. Hopefully, the already-announced sequel will expand upon Gwen’s character, along with the mystery of Peter’s absent parents.

              But of course, the undeniable star of the film is Spider-Man/Peter Parker himself. As anyone who’s seen his breakout role in The Social Network or his lesser-known yet equally sensational performance in the gut-wrenching 2007 drama Boy A can confirm, Andrew Garfield has a knack for expressing emotion through his posture and body language. With his gangly physique and hunched shoulders, he looks like he’s perpetually carrying the weight of the world, tormented by some dark emotion that’s he’s kept bottled up inside for too long; even when he smiles, there’s a hint of sadness to him, as though he isn’t quite sure what to do or how to feel. Spider-Man isn’t as emotionally demanding as Garfield’s previous roles, but you can still see that intensity, that sense of crushing self-doubt and inner melancholy, in his contorted demeanor. When Peter Parker collapses onto his uncle’s lifeless, blood-stained body, Garfield doesn’t just make you see his pain; he makes you feel it. In press interviews and talk show appearances, the actor has made clear his love for the character of Spider-Man, and it’s safe to say that every ounce of that love is visible on screen. His Peter is more than just another awkward teenage nerd (though for what it’s worth, Garfield is never less than convincing as a high school student despite being almost 30 years old at the time of filming, and he is wonderfully awkward): he’s reckless, insecure, naïve, selfish, hot-tempered, vengeful and, occasionally, insensitive, a mess of contradictions as vivid and complex as any character in modern cinema. It’s telling that the movie never treats Spider-Man as a hero; even when disguised beneath a suit and mask, deep down, he’s still the shy orphan so afflicted with loneliness and guilt that he can’t stand to be himself.



Image links:

No comments:

Post a Comment