Blessed is she or he who watches Mad Max: Fury Road and can write coherently about it. The latest
entry in George Miller’s gasoline-fueled, apocalyptic series unfolds as a fever
dream, an extended action sequence so relentlessly kinetic that the few periods
of quiet and stillness feel downright unsettling. Even now, I’m not entirely
convinced this is a real film that I experienced while conscious, let alone one
that’s legitimately good.
If stuff like this doesn’t make you appreciate
stuntmen and women, you’re hopeless.
I tend to be skeptical of the idea
that there’s inherent value in deliberately over-the-top art. White House Down may be aware of its
stupidity, but that doesn’t make it any less stupid or more fun to watch. Fury Road, however, is not over-the-top
just for the sake of being over-the-top. As a friend of mine pointed out, it’s
highly interested in exploring the concept of madness, on both an individual
level (see: the main character’s name) and a societal level (the dystopian
community led by villain, Immortan Joe, revolves around a manipulative cult).
The first ten or so minutes put us directly in Mad Max’s head, using various
aesthetic techniques, such as rapid edits and sped-up motion, to produce a
sense of mania and disorientation. As a whole, the exquisitely grotesque
production design effectively captures a world in disarray, where there are no
rules and nothing makes sense.
At a
time when Hollywood churns out big-budget spectacles like assembly-line
products, the passion of Fury Road
feels not only refreshing but vital. Here is an action movie that unabashedly
adores action, staging scenes of destruction and mayhem with the mischievous glee
of a kid experimenting with fireworks. Explosions, shootouts and armored cars
collide in a frenzied, hypnotic ballet, set to the grand, cacophonous score of
Dutch instrumentalist Junkie XL. It’s light-years away from the self-conscious
irony of such flicks as 21 Jump Street
and Guardians of the Galaxy, which
seem faintly embarrassed by their own existence, and the slick yet soulless
tedium that plagues so many tent-poles, like The Amazing Spider-Man, whose novice director Marc Webb was clearly
more interested in making a sweet romance than the flashy extravaganza he was obligated
to deliver.